Creating Eigenvalue-Eigenvector Glyphs

Envisioning second-, fourth-, and sixth-order tensors, and tensor equation invariance.

- Envisioning Second-Order Stress Tensors, σ
_{ij}- Principal Stress State
- Point Stress Tensor Glyphs: Quadric, Haber, Reynolds, HWY, PNS
- Second-Order Stress Tensor Gradients

- Envisioning Fourth-Order Stiffness Tensors, C
_{ijkl} - Envisioning Sixth-Order Stress Induced Anisotropy Tensors,
D
_{ijklmn}

In physics, engineering, chemistry, and the other physical sciences we frequently encounter the eigenvalue problem when we mathematically model physical systems. Structural design engineers encounter the eigenvalue problem when determining the principle stress state in deformable bodies. In fluid dynamics we encounter the rate of deformation tensor for fluid particles moving through Eulerian space. In wave propagation we encounter anisotropic wave velocity surfaces and particle vibration directions. Although these are all different physical systems, they have one thing in common: the mathematical model of the physical system typically results in an eigenvalue problem whose eigenvalues and eigenvectors are representative of physical properties. Often these eigenvalues-eigenvectors are embedded in much larger more complex systems where it would be of value if we could isolate the eigenvalue-eigenvectors by a glyph representation yet observe the glyph's relationship to it's surrounding functional space. Superimposed on these eigenvalue-eigenvector glyphs we can represent additional properties that show the relationship of the glyph to its surroundings. For example, a local component of the commoving derivative of a fluid particle could be represented by color mapped onto the strain rate glyph. Below we construct an illustrative example where we show how the principle stress state in a solid can be represented by an ellipsoid glyph whose shape represents the eigenvalues and whose orientation represents the direction of a principal stress state. The reader is encouraged to experiment with adding other properties to their glyphs. Rarely do eigenvalues-eigenvectors properties occur as isolated events in the physical systems that we study and model. Such a systematic rational approach leads to insight. If this technique is applicable to other systems in general, then this technique becomes a methodology: a visual methodology.

Second order tensors can be used to represent the state of stress and strain in Lagrangian space or stress and strain rate in Eulerian space. Here a Lagrangian approach is used where the components of any second order stress tensor can be reduced to an eigenvalue problem and visualized as a quadric surface, Frederick and Chang [9]. The components of a stress tensor can be written in a more familiar matrix format where it is useful to show how each matrix term is a vector component acting on the differential element shown in Fig. 27.

Figure 27. Stress tensor components shown on differential element.

When written in indical notation, σ_{ij}, this second order tensor
obeys the transformation law, Eqn. (10), where a_{ij} is the rotational
transformation matrix. Not all matrices reduced to tensors. A quantity can
only be called a tensor if its components obey the tensor transformation law.

σ^{'}_{ij}= a_{ir}a_{js}σ_{rs}(10)

X^{'}_{i}= a_{ij}X_{j}(11)

The term a_{ij} is the rotational transformation matrix defined in most
tensor theory text books. It is important to note that this transformation matrix
does not include translation as a fourth row and column, which is typically used
in most computer graphic software APIs (Application Programming Interfaces). In
the development that follows the relationship between this transformation matrix
and Euler angle will be used to rotate stress tensor glyphs into principal stress
states.

Here the second order stress tensor is transformed into an eigenvalue-eigenvector problem using tensor notation instead of matrices because of its notational brevity. For the reader who is more familiar with the matrix approach we leave this as an exercise where the reader can refer to any standard text book on deformable bodies.

Stress can be represented both as a first order tensor, σ_{i} (vector),
and as a second order tensor, σ_{ij}. These two types of stresses can
be related by cutting the differential element in Fig. 27 and applying a stress
vector on the cut plane (*P _{1},P_{2},P_{3}*), Fig.
28. To maintain equilibrium the second order stress tensor components, shown on
the opposite facing surfaces as dashed lines, must be equal to the direction
cosine components of the first order stress tensor acting on the tilted plane
(

σ_{i}= σ_{ji}n_{j}(12)

In general σ_{i} and n_{j} are oriented in different
directions and the first order stress tensor, σ_{i}, can be
resolved into normal and shear components, (σ_{N},σ_{S}).
However the plane (*P _{1},P_{2},P_{3}*) can be
oriented such that the first order stress tensor σ

σ_{i}= σ n_{i}, where σ = σ_{N}(13)

This special case is referred to as a principal direction where the magnitude of
this stress, σ, is called a principal stress, which is the scalar component
of σ_{i} projected onto the unit vector n_{j}. The color
legend will prove useful when envisioning stress type as a color gradient
projected onto various stress glyph surfaces. Development of the eigen-value
problem continues using the principal stress, σ, without the use of color.
Equating Eqn.s (12) and (13) and rearranging indices on n_{i} using the
Kronecker delta, δ_{ij}, yields

σ_{i}= σ_{ji}n_{j}= σ δ_{ij}n_{j}(14)

( σ_{ji}- σ δ_{ij}) n_{j}= 0 (15)

The Kronecker delta, δ_{ij}, is equivalent to the identity matrix.
Together with the orthogonality conditions there are four equations with four
unknowns. Equation (15) becomes an eigenvalue problem which can be rewritten
here in a more familiar matrix notation,

where the stress scalars terms, σ, along the diagonal are the three
eigenvalues (principal stresses:
σ_{a},σ_{b},σ_{c}) and the column
vector are the eigenvectors (direction cosines: "orientations" of the
principal stress state). When the differential element shown in Fig. 27
is rotated into the principal stress state the normal stresses,
σ_{xx}, σ_{yy}, and σ_{zz}
become maximums and minimums
(σ_{a},σ_{b},σ_{c}) and the shear
stresses go to zero as shown on the cube to the right in Fig. 29.

Figure 29. Rotation of differential element into the principal stress state.

This eigen-value problem is very common and there are numerous text books on numerical methods that solve for the eigen-values and eigen-vectors. Here the numerical solution is developed first followed by development of customized stress tensor "glyphs" that will hopefully provide insight from a scientific point of view. The development of the numerical solution follows.

Here a computer program is developed to solve for eigen-values and eigen-vectors using a standard Jacobi method. The complete program ( eigen.f), sample data set ( sij.data), and corresponding results ( eigen-calc-details.out, eigen-stress.out, eigen-vectors.out) can be downloaded and used to reproduce results shown here. Below we discuss the solution using code fragments.

The solutions assumes symmetric stress tensors therefore only six components are read in the order shown in the code fragment below followed by the stress location at coordinates x, y, and z. Here the notation for stress, s(i,j), is setup as an array.

c c read and write s(i,j) matrix as a symmetric second order tensor read(5,101)s(1,1),s(2,2),s(3,3),s(1,2),s(1,3),s(2,3) *,x(im),y(im),z(im) s(2,1)=s(1,2) s(3,1)=s(1,3) s(3,2)=s(2,3) write(6,200) n,itmax,eps1,eps2,eps3 do 2 i=1,n 2 write(6,201) (s(i,j),j=1,n) c c Save original s(i,j) matrix as ss(i,j) for later calcuations c because s(i,j) is modified by subroutine jacobi. do 3 i=1,n do 3 j=1,n 3 ss(i,j)=s(i,j) c c compute eigenvalues and eigenvectors call jacobi(n,s,eval,evect,itmax,eps1,eps2,eps3)Given the nine components, n=3 (3 rows and columns), of the stress tensor, s(i,j), subroutine jacobi returns a total of three eigen-values and a corresponding set of three eigen-vectors. For each i-th eigen-value, eval(i), there is a corresponding eigen-vector, evect(i,j), with three components, j=1,2,3. These eigen-vector components correspond to the direction cosines, ξ

c c Subroutine jacobi stores eigenvectors column-wise for printing c which is transposed to row-wise convention if eigenvectors are c to be equated to the tensor transformation matrix a(i,j). This c transposition is confirmed to be correct by the second order c tensor transformation of the stress tensor into the principal c stress state: sp(i,j)=a(i,k)*a(j,m)*ss(k,m). NOTE: c transposition effects the Euler angle calculations do 4 i=1,n do 4 j=1,n 4 a(i,j)=evect(j,i)Euler angles are the preferred method of rotating three-dimensional objects in many graphic programs. Below we develop a general method for extracting Euler angles from a tranformation matrix, a

**Given:** a_{ij}, **Find**: Euler angles (θ_{x},
θ_{y}, θ_{z} ). This is accomplished by creating a
transformation matrix, a_{ij}, from a sequence of three simple rotations
in Fig. 30. Because the rotation matrix, a_{ij}, is constructed from
Euler angle rotations, these angles can be extracted from this matrix using
simple algebra. Here we use the same procedure and notation outlined by Bourke
[10]. The coordinate system shown in Fig. 30 is typically used in flight
simulators with the origin located at the aircraft centroid, with the y-axis
pointing forward, the x-axis off the right wing and the z-axis pointing up.
Rotation sequence is as follows: (1) "roll" positive to the right, (2) "pitch"
positive up, and (3) "yaw" positive to the left. Note: order matters, (1) ->
(2) -> (3) is not equal to (2) -> (1) -> (3).

Figure 30. Standard flight simulator coordinates and Euler angle rotations: (1) roll, (2) pitch, (3) yaw.

Rotation sequence as experienced by a pilot sitting in the airplane cockpit,
Fig. 30: (1) roll right, +θ_{y}, Eqn. (17), (2) pitch up,
+θ_{x}, Eqn. (18), (3) yaw left, "heading", +θ_{z},
Eqn. (19). In reverse order this orientation is known as heading-pitch-roll
(HPR).

For brevity the following notation is used, for cosines: ctx=Cos(θ_{x}),
cty=Cos(θ_{y}), ctz=Cos(θ_{z}), and for sines: stx=
Sin(θ_{x}), sty=Sin(θ_{y}), stz=Sin(θ_{z}).
Combine roll followed by pitch.

Combine the roll and pitch transformation (20) above with the yaw transformation (19).

Combining all three transformations (1) -> (2) -> (3) yields the final transformation
X_{i} = a_{ij} X_{j} , where a_{11} = (ctz)(cty) +
(stz)(stx)(sty), a_{12} = (stz)(ctx), a_{13} = -(ctz)(sty) +
(stz)(stx)(cty), etc..

Recall notation -stx = -Sin(θ_{x}) = +a_{32} and collecting terms
a_{31}/a_{33} and a_{12}/a_{22}, reduces terms to
a_{31}/a_{33}=[Cos(θ_{x}) Sin(θ_{y})]/[
Cos(θ_{x}) Cos(θ_{y})]=Tan(θ_{y}), and
a_{12}/a_{22} =Tan(θ_{z}), which yields Euler angles as
functions of components of the transformation matrix, a_{ij}.

(24)

Recall the components of the transformation matrix, a_{ij} are equivalent
to the set of three eigen-vectors and can be used to calculate the Euler angles.

c c calculate angles from unprimed (reference) to primed (rotated) axes c using the transformation matrix a(i,j) = transpose of evect(i,j) angx=acos(a(1,1))*180.0/pi angy=acos(a(2,2))*180.0/pi angz=acos(a(3,3))*180.0/pi c c calculate Euler angles (degrees) aa=-a(3,2) bb=+a(3,1)/a(3,3) cc=+a(1,2)/a(2,2) eulerangx=asin(aa)*180.0/pi eulerangy=atan(bb)*180.0/pi eulerangz=atan(cc)*180.0/pi

It is important to recall that the Eqn. (23) requires the rotation order,
θ_{y}, θ_{x}, θ_{z} be used when
implementing the rotation defined by the eigen-vectors orientation of the
principal stress state.

This completes the mathematical solution of the eigen-value solution of Eqn. (16). Using these eigen-value and eigen-vector solutions, second order stress tensor "glyphs" are developed next that emphasize different physical properties of interest for the analysis of large data sets (insight) and for presentation of results.

The eigen-value problem defined in Eqn. (16) appears frequently in the applied sciences. Depending on the application the coefficient matrix consists of different physical quantities. Although the mathematics provides a common method for solving for the eigen-values and eigen-vectors, it is important to maintian the physical context when creating a graphical representation (glyph) of a physical property. It is often this context that leads to insight from the scientists who are visualizing their complex data sets for the first time. This is why the ESM4714 class is named "Scientific Visual Data Analysis" and just not "Visualization" or "Information Visualization". To be insightful from a scientific perspective the word scientific is used to qualify the type of data analysis. This also explains why the development here continues with a focus on the physical concepts of equilibrium and how the components of stress are visualized as normal and shear componets that exist within the definition of a stress quadric surface, e.g. stress tensor glyphs. Several researchers [8,11,13,14] have demonstrated the usefulness of visualizing second order tensor glyphs. The development of these glyphs revealed information that went beyond the initial physical understanding of the problem. Similarly the development of the glyph here also demonstrates how glyphs can provide insight that transcends the traditional use of graphics, namely: graphics for presentation. In the final section these ideas are extended to higher order tensors. Through out the development of tensor glyphs shown here, the quantitative mathematical idea of invariance of tensor equations is used to qualitatively envision and understand physical properties and their relationships as laws. Consequently envisioning invariance enables scientists to see and understand the qualitative content of equations associated with the physical laws, e.g. static equlibrium and dynamic equations of motion.

The development of the eigen-value problem requires that all properties and
their relationships exist at points. For example in Fig. 28 points *P _{1
}*,

*Quadric Surface Glyphs: Equilibrium Defines Shape*

| σ_{ij}- σ δ_{ij}| = 0 (25)

(26)

Here the eigen-values can be determined by expanding the determinate into a
polynomial cubic equation, which is a function of the second order stress
components, σ_{ij}, and σ^{3}. This is called the
characteristic equation whose roots are numerically the same as the
eigen-values solved for in Eqn. (16). These roots or eigen-values together
with the principal directions can be visualized as a quadric surface,
F(ξ_{i}), which like the characteristic equation is also a scalar
function of the components of the second order stress tensor,
σ_{ij}.

F(ξ_{i}) = σ_{ij}ξ_{i}ξ_{j}= k^{2}(27)

This quadric surface is envsioned as an elliptical "glyph" in Fig. 31, whose
major and minor axis lengths are functions of the eigen-values
(σ_{a},σ_{b},σ_{c}) and orientation of
these axes (ξ_{1},ξ_{2},ξ_{3})
are the eigen-vectors. Frederick and Chang [9] outline two additional
properties that add insight to the relationship between stress as a first
and second order tensor.

Property (i) Let Q be a point on the quadric surface, and let the distance
PQ = r. Then the stress, σ_{i}, at P acting across the surface
normal to PQ is inversely proportional to the radius vector, r, squared.

Property (ii) The stress vector at P, acting across the area that is normal to PQ, is parallel to the normal to the surface of the stress quadric at Q, see Fig. 31.

Note: both properties are related to the shape of the quadric surface which
is defined by the components of the second order stress tensor, σ_{ij
}. Proofs of these two properties are also insightful from an analytic
point of view.

Figure 31. Stress tensor quadric surface "glyph" from Fredrick and Chang [9].

In summary the stress shown as a first order tensor, σ_{i},
is parallel to the gradient of scalar function, F(ξ_{i}), which is
perpendicular to the quadric surface. Since the shape of the quadric surface
is a function of the second order stress tensor, σ_{ij}, the
relationship between σ_{i} and σ_{ij} is envisioned
qualitatively as a collection of all orientations of the plane
(*P _{1},P_{2},P_{3}*) pointing in the direction
of n

Envisioning invariance enables scientists to see and understand the content of equations associated with physical laws qualitatively, e.g. equilibrium. This same approach could be used to create a method of understanding the qualitative content of equations assoicated with other physical laws. Here the concept of equilibrium is one of the simplest laws, however, how this simple idea is linked to tensor equation invariance requires prior knowledge of tensor theory. To appreciate this conceptual congnitive link one must first appreciate and understand both tensor equation invariance and how equilibium must exist in all possible directions if this idea, encapsulated in this graphical method, can be called a law. This understanding must also exist prior to, and independent of, the graphical tool. To effectively use the graphical method and corresponding graphical tools the user must posses this prior knowledge.

Again the idea of a gradient is an important concept used here to envision
that the gradient of the quadric surface is pointing in the same direction
as, σ_{i}. It is possible to draw a collection of short lines
perpendicular to the quadric surface that shows all of these directions for
all n_{i}, however the same color mapping developed in Fig. 28 can be
used instead, which accomplishes the same result. Perhaps the color gradient
would be easier to cognitively process than a "porcupine" glyph. An example
of a principal stress state,
[σ_{a},σ_{b},σ_{c}] = [+1,+2,+3], is
shown in Fig. 32 using color gradients to envision θ for all possible
n_{i} and associated first and second order stress tensors.

Figure 32. Stress quadric surface ellipsoid of [+1,+2,+3]

Creating the necessary topology, vertices and polygons, and color mapped onto these topologies is essentially the same for all of the tensor glyphs developed here. Here the spherical coordinate system is used to generate glyph topology, Fig. 33.

Figure 33. Spherical coordinate system used to generate glyph topology.

Depending on the glyph type the distance, e, is a function of the angles, θ and φ, and the components of the second order stress tensor. For the quadric surface glyph this function is the function subroutine named sq, which is shown below as a code fragment. The value for sq is returned as the distance from the quadric surface to the geometric glyph centroid.

function sq(p,t,s11,s12,s13,s22,s23,s33) c c*********************************************************************** c* Calculate distance, "sq", from the quadric surface to the geometric * c* glyph centroid which is equivalent to the inverse of the square * c* root of the normal stress of the first order stress tensor, Si, * c* which acts in equilibrium with the second order stress tensor, Sij, * c* definded by Cauchy's relations. In the direction defined by * c* spherical coordinates: (theta,phi) * c* where theta = t 0->180 degress along the longitude * c* phi = p 0->360 degrees along the latitute * c*********************************************************************** c c Define unit vector direction cosines d1=sin(t)*cos(p) d2=sin(t)*sin(p) d3=cos(t) c c Calculate components of the first order stress tensor from the c second order stress tensor terms using Cauchy's relationship s1=s11*d1+s12*d2+s13*d3 s2=s12*d1+s22*d2+s23*d3 s3=s13*d1+s23*d2+s33*d3 c c Calculate the normal, "sn", component of the first order stress tensor c projected in the direction of the unit normal perpendicular to the c plane on which the first order stress tensor is acting. sn=s1*d1+s2*d2+s3*d3 c c Calcualte quadric surface distance, sq trace=(1./abs(s11)+1./abs(s22)+1./abs(s33))/3.0 sq=sqrt(trace/abs(sn)) c write(6,12)sn,sq if(sq.gt.3.2*trace)sq=3.2*trace c 12 format(' ********************************************************* c ************************',/,' sn=',e12.5,' sq=',e12.5) c return endWhen all of the principal stresses are positive the quadric surface is an ellipsoid, Fig. 32. When one or two of the principal stresses are negative the quadric surface is a symmetric three dimensional elliptic cone, Fig. 34. Because color gradients of stress type are distorted when mapped onto the irregular shapes of the conical quadric surfaces, Mercator maps of the stress type color gradient are seen undistorted below each image.

Figure 34. Stress quadric elliptical conical surface for [+1,-2,+3] and [+1,-2,-3]

These conical surfaces are interesting in that they clearly show the 3D
curved surfaces along which pure shear exists. Returning to Fig. 28 the
state of pure shear exists when σ_{N} = 0 on the plane
(*P _{1},P_{2},P_{3}*) which is the same plane
shown in Fig. 30. When the stress σ

trace=(1./abs(s11)+1./abs(s22)+1./abs(s33))/3.0 sq=sqrt(trace/abs(sn)) if(sq.gt.3.2*trace)sq=3.2*traceAs expected the green color near pure shear is seen on the truncated portion of the glyphs shown in Fig. 34. Unfortunately the green color corresponding to pure shear at infinity has been truncated.

All tensor glyphs require a list of x, y, and z coordinates for each vertice located on the glyph surface and a list of vertices associates with each polygon that creates the glyph surface. The vertice list of x, y, and z coordinates is calcuated from the distance return by the function subroutine associate with each type of second-order tensor glyph. However the polygon list of vertices is identically the same for all four second-order stress tensor glyphs developed in this section. The polygon list of vertices is generted by sequencing through the spherical coordinate angles θ and φ defined in Fig. 33 as shown in the code segment below.

program m_glyph_poly_tp c c*********************************************************************** c program m_glyph_poly_tp generates polygon file or "connectivity" data* c file assigning polygon numbers to vertice numbers. Together with each* c of the vertice data files associated with PNS, HWY, Reynolds, and the* c quadric glyph, this polygon data file defines each of the four Sij * c second order stress tensor 3D glyph geometries. * c*********************************************************************** c open(6,file='tp_poly.out',status='unknown',err=8888) open(8,file='d_poly.dat',status='unknown',err=8888) pi=acos(-1.) c c 360 and 180 Resolution Divided by 3 nphi=121 rphi=360.0 ntheta=61 rtheta=180.0 c c calcuate the total number of vertices ivert=0 do 200 iphi=1,nphi do 100 itheta=1,ntheta ivert=ivert+1 100 continue 200 continue write(6,210)ivert 210 format(' Total number of vertices=',i7) c c create polygonal portion of the wave surface topology ipnt1=0 iarray=0 nphm1=nphi-1 nthm1=ntheta-1 do 400 iphi=1,nphm1 do 300 itheta=1,nthm1 theta=(itheta-1)*rtheta/(nthm1-1) ipnt2=ipnt1+1 ipnt4=ipnt1+ntheta ipnt3=ipnt4+1 if (theta.eq.0.0)then n=3 write(8,255)n,ipnt1,ipnt2,ipnt3 255 format(4(1x,i5)) elseif (theta.eq.180.0)then n=3 write(8,255)n,ipnt1,ipnt2,ipnt4 else n=4 write(8,260)n,ipnt1,ipnt2,ipnt3,ipnt4 260 format(5(1x,i5)) endif iarray=iarray+n+1 ipnt1=ipnt1+1 ielmnt=ielmnt+1 300 continue ipnt1=ipnt1+1 400 continue write(6,500)iarray 500 format(' Total number of polygons=',i7) c 8888 stop endA complete summary of these examples with the code that was used to generate images of stress quadric glyphs and other glyph types are posted at:

A visual summary of images (*.jpg), animations (animated *.gif), and VRML (*.wrl) files are posted at:

At the bottom right of the visual summary web page .../Sij_results.html composite
images show the three quadric surface glyphs in Fig.s 32 and 34 together
for comparison. Off diagonal stress tensor components for these three glyphs
are zero and no rotations into a principal stress state are observed. However
the fourth glyph where σ_{ij} =
(σ_{11}, σ_{22}, σ_{33},
σ_{12}, σ_{13}, σ_{23}) =
(-0.069e+03, -0.018e+03, +0.274e+03, -0.074e+03, +0.021e+03, -0.041e+03) is
not in a principal stress state and a rotation into a principal stress state
is observed:
VRML-1_file /
VRML-2_file .
A screen capture of this VRML file comparing these four quadric surface
glyphs is shown in Fig. 35.

Figure 35. Screen capture of four second order stress tensor quadric surface glyphs as seen using the Cortona web browser plugin.

Each glyph is labled with red, green, and blue axes which correspond to the
ξ_{1}, ξ_{2}, and ξ_{3} principal axes. Not
all VRML web browser plugins can view fonts used to label these axes. To see
the rotation of the fourth glyph a reference global axes is shown as larger
red, green, and blue axes. The global reference axes is shown to coincide
with the first quadric surface glyph, [+1,+2,+3] in the upper right corner
in Fig. 35, because the center of the first glyph coincides with the origin
of the global axes. Because the first quadric glyph is already in a principal
stress state no rotation is observed and the axes coincide. However the fourth
glyph shown in the lower left corner of Fig. 35 is observed to rotate with
respect to the global reference axes. With VRML syntax it is also not possible
to show a color legend that does not move with the global axes. Regardless of
these issues, VRML files are useful because the viewer can rotate glyphs
interactively and compare glyph shapes and orientations. If the reader does
not have a VRML plugin installed on their web browser, animations of
individual glyph rotations can be viewed using a standard web browser: select
the movie icon shown to the right of each Mercator color map. Larger clusters
of glyphs would reveal more information, however the example shown here
compares only four glyphs.

*Haber Glyphs: Elliptical Disks and Rods ("keep it simple")*

Figure 36. Cluster of Stress tensor glyphs showing the gradients of second order stress tensors uniformly distributed in the region near a moving crack and superposed on top of scalar properties shown here as gradients, Ref. [11]: surface height, sqrt(kinetic energy density) and color, ln(strain energy density).

Notice that unlike the quadric surface glyphs, this glyph's shape is that of a simple rod and an elliptical disk. Although the quadric surface reveals additional information about the direction of the stress vector in a particular direction, Haber's glyphs are better suited to reveal magnitudes of the principal stress state without obscuring other properties as shown in Fig. 36. In this case less is more when selecting a glyph type. The shape shown above, Fig. 37, is more easily recognized when envisioning eigenvalues or principal stresses as minor, intermediate, and major axes. Because of this simple shape it is also easier to envision the principal directions. Perhaps glyphs can have too much information assimulated into its shape, color, and orientation. Although the quadric surface glyph is insightful, insight like beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Ultimately the scientist must decide how to envision their data. This is why the most insightful visual models are created and customized by the scientists themselves. The same is true when constructing the mathematical model of the physical system being studied. In both cases insight is realized when the scientist creates both their own mathematical and visual models.

Fig. 38. Dynamic center crack: color represents log (strain energy density), which is mapped onto a raised surface that represents the square root of the kinetic energy density. Notice the singularity at the crack tip, Ref. [12]. Animation: MPEG Movie (1.2Mb,141 frames)

An interference pattern observed at the center of a plate in Fig. 38 is caused by circular stress waves emanating from the two crack tips. Here the stress tensor glyphs have been removed to view the development of these interference patterns in an animated movie of Fig. 38, Ref. [12]. This animation displays the simulation - visualization results of two crack tips growing away from the center of the plate and shows the development of this interesting interference pattern. This stress wave interaction provided an insightful explanation of the irregularities observed in the dynamic crack tip stress intensity factors measured experimentally at the National Bureau of Standards.

The numerical solution to this fracture mechanics problem provided the raw data from which the stress tensor glyphs were created. Although these glyphs were observed to move over large distances with the crack tip, which is an Eulerian concept, it is interesting to note that the deformation field is not Eulerian but Lagrangian.

*Reynolds Stress Tensor Glyphs: Normal Stresses Define Shape*

(28)

Once the principal directions are determined, the principal components of the Reynolds stress tensor are found by transforming the fluctuating velocity components,

(29)

where the repeated indices "i" implies summation and the subscript "n" on P is not an index but implies principal directions. The dyadic product is used again to create the components of the Reynolds stress tensor but now in the principal stress state.

(30)

A new glyph can now be created by mapping this relationship into a cube with the unit vector (dx,dy,dz), where sqrt(dx**2 + dy**2 + dz**2) = 1.

(31)

The mathematical development of Moore, Schorn,and Moore shown above can be
simply summarized as folows: use the normal component of stress,
σ_{N}, shown in Fig. 28, as the glyph radius. The collection
of all radii for all directions, n_{i}, defines the glyph shape.

The use of dyadic product of velocities, u_{i}u_{j} to
construct the second order stress tensor is similar to taking the tensor
outer product without contracting the indices. The fact that velocity
squared with dimensions of (m/sec)^{2} is equivalent to the
dimensions of stress in Pascals (N/m^{2}), is realized when
muliplying the velocity squared by density. Although common knowledge to
the community of fluid dynamicists, this dimensional analysis is noteworthy
here for those not familiar with the fact that the glyhps shown of velocity
squared are equivalent to the stress tensor by a constant scalar factor of
density.

As shown in Fig. 39 the resulting glyph is peanut shaped. Unlike the quadric surface the largest principal stress corresponds to the largest dimension and unlike the Haber glyph the exaggerated curvature of the peanut shape emphasizes the anisotropy of the normal component of the principal stress. To emphasize the shape of this glyph, Moore, Schorn and Moore [13] mapped color contours of minimum and maximum normal stress onto the glyph surface.

Figure 39. Comparison of the Reynolds stress tensor glyph with a quadric surface glyph, Ref. [13].

The comparison in Fig. 39 demonstrates that the principal stress
σ_{a} along the X axis is scaled differently. For the
quadric glyph, property (i) associated with Fig. 31 requires that the
distance from the centroid to the surface equal the square root of
1/σ_{a }. For the Reynolds glyph the distance from the
centroid to the surface is simply equal to σ_{a}.
This reverses the maximum and minimum stresses mapped onto the surface.
The same is true for the other principal stresses and their directions.
The shape of the Reynolds glyph on the right in Fig. 28, is constructed
from the normal stress components, σ_{N}, of the first
order tensor, σ_{i} in all possible directions. However
the collection of all vectors envisioned normal to the surface of the
quadric glyph, on the left in Fig. 28, reveal the directions of all
possbile first order tensors, σ_{i}, necessary to maintain
equilibrium. For quadric glyphs cones reveal the collection of planes
of pure shear. Since a state of pure shear does not exist in fluids,
quadric glyphs are always seen as ellipsoids. Hence quadric glyphs
would be more useful when studying the state of pure shear in solids.
Hence each glyph envisions a different property of σ_{i}.
The choice of which glyph to use depends on what property the researcher
wants to investigate when envisioning information for insight or what
property the research wants to use when presenting information to
educate others. When envisioning information for presentation, the rule
has been not to make the graphic too "busy" or cluttered with detail to
the point of being distracting. When envisioning information for insight,
the rule is to envision as many different properties as possible in the
same space without exceeding the researcher's ability to link their
prior knowledge to the collection of graphical objects used to model
these properties. This is called the cognitive limit which depends on
the observers ability to link images to their prior scientific knowledge.
When possible, clarify by adding detail when designing a graphical model
for insight without exceeding the observer's cognitive limit. The same
could be said for presentation assuming the audience shares the same
prior scientific knowledge. Because everyones prior scientific knowledge
is different, it is important that the researcher design and create
graphical models as they anticipate the observer's prior scientific
knowledge.

Development of the Reynolds stress tensor to study turbulence in turbomachinery was the focus of Joan and John Moore's research while at Virginia Tech. Their research continues with recent advances on how Reynolds stress tensor glyphs are used to study turbulence. On the Moores' web pages are links to their new text book, "Functional Reynolds Stress Modeling". This research is an excellent example of how graphic models are developed within the context the science as understood by the researcher. Because of this context these customized graphic models become insightful by those who understand the science. Because of this context, results of these graphical models can also be used for presentation within the scientific community.

When envisioning information for insight, more information is obtained when arranging these glyphs in an evenly spaced array, compared to a conventional use of contour lines and vectors. To clarify add detail. These two formats are compared in Fig. 40 which is a composite of Fig.s 2 and Fig. 8 taken from Ref. [13]. In the lower left region of Fig. 40 the glyph size is scaled to represent the magnitude of the prinicipal stresses. The larger glyphs represent larger stresses which can obscure or hide information on adjacent glyphs.

Figure 40. Comparison of Reynolds stress tensor glyphs with contour lines, Fig. 2 (left) and Fig. 8 (right) taken from Ref. [13]. A larger format of this figure is made available here and in Ref. [13].

The Reynolds and quadric glyphs are compared again in Fig. 41, by using
different color mapping proposed in Fig.s 28 and 31. The color contours
mapped onto the surface in Fig.s 39 and 40 are scaled with respect to
the minimum and maximum normal stresses which can be very useful for
both insight and presentation. However if the researcher wants to
envision the direction of the orientation of the first order stress
tensor, σ_{i}, that reveals the orientation of the pure
shear stress state, this choice is better shown in Fig. 41 using the
quadric glyph. Again the point is made that envisioning information
should be a choice within the intent to provide scientific insight or
to educate others, e.g. "presentation", who share the researcher's
prior scientific knowledge.

Figure 41. Comparison of Reynolds and quadric glyphs using a color gradient on the surface that shows stress type, defined in Fig. 28, for a principal stress state of [+1,-2,+3].

By mapping stress type as color, the green shear stress is observed to
coincide with the conical surface of the quadric glyph, where shear is
expected, but shear is observed on the Reynolds glyph surface where it
was not expected. This new information reveals that although the shape
of the Reynolds glyph is defined only by using the normal stress
components, σ_{N}, shear stress can be envision as well.
The distance from the centroid of the Reynolds glyph to the surface is
calculated using the function subroutine, sn, shown below.

function sn(p,t,s11,s12,s13,s22,s23,s33) c c*********************************************************************** c* Calculate normal component, "sn" of the first order stress tensor * c* acting in the direction of the unit vector normal to the plane on * c* which the first order stress tensor, Si, acts in equilibrium with * c* the second order stress tensor, Sij, defined by Cauchy's relation. * c* In the direction defined by spherical coordinates: (theta,phi) * c* where theta = t 0->180 degress along the longitude * c* phi = p 0->360 degrees along the latitute * c*********************************************************************** c c Define unit vector direction cosines d1=sin(t)*cos(p) d2=sin(t)*sin(p) d3=cos(t) c c Calculate components of the first order stress tensor from the c second order stress tensor terms` using Cauchy's relationship s1=s11*d1+s12*d2+s13*d3 s2=s12*d1+s22*d2+s23*d3 s3=s13*d1+s23*d2+s33*d3 c c Calculate the normal component, "sn" of first order stress tensor c projected in the direction of the unit normal perpendicular to the c plane on which the first order stress tensor is acting. sn=s1*d1+s2*d2+s3*d3 c return end

A comparision similar to that done for different types of principal stress states in Fig. 35 is shown here for Reynolds glyphs in Fig. 42. Again the VRML-1 and VRML-2 files can be download into a web plugin viewer or *.gif animated rotations of the same Reynolds glyphs can be viewed from movie icon links on the Sij_results.html web page.

Figure 42. Screen capture of four second order stress tensor Reynolds glyphs as seen using the Cortona web browser plugin. Web links are provided for VRML-1 and VRML-2 files.

*HWY Glyphs: Shear Stresses Define Shape*

Figure 43. Comparison of quadric, Reynolds and HWY glyphs using a color gradient on the surface that shows stress type for a principal stress state of [+1,-2,+3].

The distance from the centroid of the HWY glyph to the surface is the
shear component, σ_{S}, of the first order stress,
σ_{i}, shown in Fig. 28. This shear component,
σ_{S}, is calculated using the function
subroutine, ss, shown below.

function ss(p,t,s11,s12,s13,s22,s23,s33) c c*********************************************************************** c* Calculate shear component, "ss", of the first order stress tensor * c* acting in the direction of the unit vector normal to the plane on * c* which the first order stress tensor, Si, acts in equilibrium with * c* the second order stress tensor, Sij, defined by Cauchy's relation. * c* In the direction defined by spherical coordinates: (theta,phi) * c* where theta = t 0->180 degress along the longitude * c* phi = p 0->360 degrees along the latitute * c*********************************************************************** c c Define unit vector direction cosines d1=sin(t)*cos(p) d2=sin(t)*sin(p) d3=cos(t) c c Calculate components of the first order stress tensor from the c second order stress tensor terms using Cauchy's relationship s1=s11*d1+s12*d2+s13*d3 s2=s12*d1+s22*d2+s23*d3 s3=s13*d1+s23*d2+s33*d3 c c Calculate the normal, "sn" component of first order stress tensor c projected in the direction of the unit normal perpendicular to the c plane on which the first order stress tensor is acting. sn=s1*d1+s2*d2+s3*d3 c c Calcuate the shear "ss" component ss=sqrt(s1**2+s2**2+s3**2-sn**2) c return endA comparison similar to that done for different types of principal stress states in Fig.s 35 and 42 is shown here for HWY glyphs in Fig. 44. Again the VRML-1 and VRML-2 files can be download into a web plugin viewer or *.gif animated rotations of the same HWY glyphs can be viewed from movie icon links on the Sij_results.html web page.

Figure 44. Screen capture of four second order stress tensor HWY glyphs as seen using the Cortona web browser plugin. Web links are provided for VRML-1 and VRML-2 files.

*PNS glyph: Principal Normal Stresses Define Ellipsoidal Shape*

Figure 45. Comparison of quadric, Reynolds, HWY, and PNS glyphs using a color gradient on the surface that shows stress type for a principal stress state of [+1,-2,+3].

The distance from the centroid of the PNS glyph to the surface of and
ellipsoid whose major, intermediate, and minor axis are defined by the
principal stresses (σ_{a},σ_{b},σ_{c}).
This distance is returned as a radius, e, and calculated using the
function subroutine, e, shown below.

function e(p,t,a,b,c) c c*********************************************************************** c* Calculate radius, e, for an ellipsoid whose major, intermediate, * c* and minor axis are given by a,b,c respectively, in the direction * c* defined by spherical coordiantes: (theta,phi). * c* where theta = t 0->180 degress along the longitude * c* phi = p 0->360 degrees along the latitute * c*********************************************************************** ct2=cos(t)*cos(t) st2=sin(t)*sin(t) cp2=cos(p)*cos(p) sp2=sin(p)*sin(p) d=st2*cp2/a**2+st2*sp2/b**2+ct2/c**2 e=sqrt(1/d) return end

A comparison similar to that done for different types of principal stress states in Fig.s 35, 42, and 44 is shown here for PNS glyphs in Fig. 46. Again the VRML-1 and VRML-2 files can be download into a web plugin viewer or *.gif animated rotations of the same PNS glyphs can be viewed from movie icon links on the Sij_results.html web page.

Figure 46. Screen capture of four second order stress tensor PNS glyphs as seen using the Cortona web browser plugin. Web links are provided for VRML-1 and VRML-2 files.

A visual summary of these four glyphs were used to study two different types of residual stresses gradients: 1) residual stresses near welds, and 2) surface residual stresses induced by plastic deformations (shot peening) in a Titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V). This research was collaboration with Professor M. Harting, and Mr. Mecit Yaman, Ph.D candidate, in the Department of Physics at the University of Cape Town, South Africa and Dr. Ron Kriz, Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Viriginia, USA. A complete description of results from this collaboration is available by going to the web link: Residual Stress Gradient Visualization. However a brief summary is include here as an example of how an array of second-order stress tensor glyphs can be used to study residual stresses in welds and stress gradients near surfaces due to plastic deformation.

The first four images show the quadric, Reynolds, HWY, and PNS glyphs superposed on top of the weld structure, Fig. 47. Only the principal stresses are shown in Fig. 47, which does not show the rotations into the principal stress state. Images in Fig. 47 are scaled to fit the width of a typical web page. To view these images in more detail, a web link of results in a larger image format is provided here for reference. For comparison only the quadric glyph type for "as-welded" and "post-heat-treated" are shown in one file where the rotations of the various principal stress states can be compared using the VRML file format, Fig. 48.

Figure 47. Quadric, Reynolds, HWY, and PNS glyphs for the "as-welded" condition is superposed onto weld structure. The "post-heat-treated" condition not shown A web link of all results including large image formats is provided here for reference.

Figure 48. Quadric glyph arrays of "as-welded" and "post-heat-treated" combined into single VRML-1 and VRML-2 file format where principal directions are shown as rotated glyphs.

This collection of second-order stress tensor glyphs when organized into an array and superposed on top of the weld structures can facilitate the analysis of how changes in residual stresses correspond to weld structure. In Fig. 48 results in the "as-welded" conditions are observed to change when compared with the "post-heat-treated" condition. This large array of glyphs shown in Fig. 48 would benefit from an immersive virtual environment, where the viewer can move through space and view these stress tensor gradients immersively by using three-dimensional head tracking. This is possible by renaming the VRML-1 file extension from *.wrl to the Inventor format *.iv. This is possible because when SGI was the leader in graphical interface, the VRML-1 and Inventor file formats were interchangeable. Since most immersive application programming interfaces (APIs) can load Inventor files, the VRML-1 files can be viewed interactively both at the desktop computer using a Web browser plugin and in an immersive environment. Immersive environments are particulary useful when interpreting large arrays of data in a three-dimensional gradient format.

Briefly, results of stress gradients are also shown near a surface induced by plastic deformation (shot peening) in a Titanium alloy. Again web links to VRML file formats are provided for downloading into Web browser plugins or into immersive environments. A web link of results summarizes gradients near the surface where quadric, Reynolds, HWY, and PNS glyphs are used for comparison.

Figure 49. Residual stress profiles, VRML-1 and VRML-2, caused by shot peening near the surface of a Titanium alloy.

Figure 50. Residual stress profiles loaded into an immersive environment where the cube shown at the center visually simulates the location of the 10' by 10' by 10' walls where stereo images are projected.

These results show a significant change in the principal stresses near the surface, but only a slight rotational gradient with depth in both Fig.s 49 and 50. Immersive environments proved to be useful when large arrays of glyphs were created.

*Stress Tensor Gradients in One Dimension: Tensor Tubes*

Figure 51. Creation of stress tensor tubes from stacked PNS ellipsoidal glyphs.

In Fig. 52 the center of the two glyph tubes propagate upward along trajectories or line s that represent the direction (eigenvector) of the largest compressive stress. In this figure the color represents the magnitude of the largest compressive stress (the minor eigenvalue). The shape of the tube represents the magnitudes of the other two eigenvalues. Similar trajectories near the bottom of the figure for the other two eigenvectors take a shape that is everywhere perpendicular to the most compressive stress. These flat tened tubes show that one of the eigenvalues must be close to zero.

Figure 52. Elastic-stress tensor field in a solid induced by two compressive forces applied at the top surface, Refs. [15, 16].

The next figure, Fig. 53, shows how the shape of the tubes in Fig. 52 change if an additional tension force is applied at the top surface (the exact location is not specified) Ref. [15, 16]. The shape of these glyphs are shown to change with increasing tension force (a) -> (b) -> (c) -> (d).

Figure 53. Elastic-stress tensor field glyphs shape changed by additional tension surface force. Glyph (c) shows that one of the principal stresses is zero, Refs. [15, 16]

In this example the magnitude of the compressive principal stress was mapped as color on the continuous stress tensor glyph. Many other combinations are discussed in Ref. [15,16].

Tensor tubes prove to be useful when envisioning gradients in one direction: e.g.
in Fig. 51 as ΔX_{3} approaches zero the stacked PNS elllipsoidal
glyphs obscure informaton in the X_{3} direction, however color can be used
to recover this information but only in X_{3} direction. Since mathematical
concept of gradients is three-dimensional, another visual approach is explored
that envisions gradients of stress tensors in all three-dimensions.

*Point Stress Tensor Gradients in Three Dimensions*

Figure 54. Stress glyph gradient where there is no change in shape or orientation of the nearest neighboring stress glyphs collapsing onto the center glyph.

If the glyph spacing is small but the 3D collection of glyphs does not obscure the viewer from seeing how glyphs change their shape and orientation as these glyphs collapse onto the center glyph, than the viewer is seeing a stress gradient within a discrete change in space.

Δσ_{ij}/ ΔX_{k}(32)

In the limit as ΔX_{k} goes to zero, Eqn. (32) reduces to

σ_{ij,k}(33)

which transforms as a third order tensor. Summing forces requires a contraction on the "i" and "k" indices which yields,

σ_{kj,k}(34)

The collection of glyphs in Fig. 54 envisions the gradient collapsing or
expanding on the center glyph but only for one particular orientation,
σ_{ji,j}=0, which satisfies equilibrium in this particular
direction. However equilibrium is a law, therefore it must exist in all
possible directions and arbitrarily so.
This idea of invariance in a physical sense is the same as invariance
in a mathematical sense by transforming each term in the equlibrium
equation, σ*'*_{kj,k}=0. The apostrophy
symbolically represents this arbitrary mathematical transformation.
The fact that the equation maintains it's form after such an arbitrary
transformation is the idea of mathematical invariance.
How would we envision a collection of glyphs that would visually represent
a gradient in any arbitrary direction? What would this 3D image look like?
One possible implementation of this idea is to envision an infinite set of
stress quadric surface glyphs propagating outward from the center glyph in
all possible directions simultaneously. This collection of stress tensor
glyphs would be expanding not collapsing. This idea is similar to Huygen's
principle for 2D plane waves eminating from a point, but using 3D stress
quadric surface glyphs instead. An expanding 3D small multiple of 3D objects.
This image would be difficult to envision and represents a limit in our
visual cognitive ability to envision stress gradients in any arbitrary
direction. Although difficult for mortals to envision, such a surface
would be seen as symmetric -- a necessary requirement to satisfy
equilibrium and it's gradients.

Glyphs can also be used to better understand higher order tensors. For example,
fourth order stiffness tensor, C_{ijkl}, can also be envisioned using
simple glyphs. The fourth order stiffness tensor relates all of the components of
the second-order strain tensor, l_{kl} to the second-order stress tensor,
σ_{ij}.

This relationship is called generalized Hooke's law. This equation is a tensor equation and can not be written in matrix notation unless using contracted Voigt notation. This contracted format is written as 6x6 matrice, however these contract terms will not transform as tensor components. Here the tensor format is maintain that will prove useful when envisioning physical properties associated with mathemtical invariance of tensor equations. This mathematic invariance can be demonstrated when each term of the tensor Eqn. (36) is transformed as a tensor of that order and the original form of the tensor equation remains unchanged. When Eqn. (35) is combinded with the equations of motion, the result is another tensor equation called the Christoffel's equations of motion, Eqn. (36). A complete development of Christoffel's equations can be studied at: Introduction to Mechanical Behavior of Anisotropic Materials: Geometric Representations of Elastic Anisotropy: All Tensor Components, Cσ _{ij}= C_{ijkl}l_{kl}(35)

(36)

If the indices are expanded, Eqn. (36) reduces to eigen-value problem, where the
eigenvalues, ρv^{2}, are related to the wave speeds, v, and density,
ρ, and the eigenvectors are the particle vibration directions, p_{k},
of Eqn. (36). The surface shown in Fig. 55 is generated by prescribing all
possible directions, ν_{i} and ν_{j} in Eqn. (36) and
mapping out all of these solutions as a glyph: the eigen-value solutions, wave
velocities, v, is the distance from the geomtric center to the surface and
the eigen-vector solutions are used to map a color for each eigen-value solution
at the point where the pointing vector, ν_{i}, intersects the surface.
Since both the eigen-values and their corresponding eigen-vectors are functions
only of C_{ijkl}, see Eqn. (36), then the surface shape and colors shown
in Fig. 55 can be used to envision this fourth-order stiffness tensor. Because
all terms of the fourth-order tensor were used to calculate the wave surface and
its colors we see the relationship between the eigenvalues and their
corresponding eigenvectors at every point on this surface. We can also observe
the spin properties of the displacement fields as color gradients that exist
near degeneracies in the eigen-values that appear as the concave portion of the
wave surface that collapse to a point (see black region). It is through these
degeneracies that wave surfaces can interconnect into single continuous
connected wave surfaces (mode-transitions at eigen-value
degeneracies ) Kriz and Ledbetter [18]. At these same degeneracies internal
conical refraction exist. Again the mathematical invariant property of tensor
equations is used here to develop an understanding of the physical properties
envisioned in Fig. 55.

Figure 55. Fourth order stiffness tensor glyph for a single crystal of Calcium
Formate (orthorhombic symmetry). Shape of surface maps the wave velocity for
the fastest of the two quasi-transverse waves [17,18]. Here only the intermediate
wave surface is shown. The outermost and inner most wave surfaces are not shown.
Visual Numerics PV-Wave software, Ref. [21], maps the particle vibration directions
onto the glyph surface as color: black corresponds to longitudinal (0^{o})
vibration directions and white corresponds to transverse (90^{o}).

Several researchers [17, 18, 19, 20] have used Christoffel's equation to study the symmetries of waves propagating in different crystal class symmetries. A summary of results for differnt crystal class symmetries is present here as an example.

**3D C _{ijkl} Wavesurfaces:** Here numerous web links are provided.
Wave surface
geometries are defined
as it represents the fourth order stiffenss tensor, C

- Isotropic (polycrystalline): Stainless Steel
- Cubic Symmetry: Aluminum
- Hexagonal Symmetry: Zinc
- Transversly Isotropic: Unidirectional Graphite/Epoxy (Fiber Volume Fraction = 66%)
- Tetragonal Symmetry: Tellurium Dioxide: Discussion on wave surface "cross-overs".
- Orthorhombic Symmetry:
- Type-1:
Benzene
(Most Common: Inner and Intermediate Wave Surfaces Connected)

- Type-1:
Barium-Yitrium-CopperOxide (Wave Surfaces Connected due to superconducting phase transformation)

- Type-2:
Calcium Formate
(Rarest: All Wave Surfaces Connected Into a Single Surface)

- Type-3:
Hypothetical
(Outer, Intermediate, and Inner Wave Surfaces Not Connected)

- Type-4:
Hypothetical
(Outer and Intermediate Wave Surfaces Connected)

- Type-1:
Benzene
(Most Common: Inner and Intermediate Wave Surfaces Connected)

The reader interested in the tensor approach to this dynamic problem is encouraged
to study references [17, 18, 19]. For the reader only interested in the previous
example of the principal stress state, it is not difficult to show that equation
(36) reduces to equation (15). This is a simple task using tensor notation. Both
equations are rewritten here to facilite the comparison.

(36)(15)

and the scalar terms(37) and (38)

(39)

Eqn. (36) reduces to the same tensor equation that defines the eigen-value problem, Eqn. (15),

(40).

Except for the term, β_{ij} which is contracted with the fourth order
stiffness tensor, C_{ijkl}, see Eqn. (37), the β_{ij} term in
Eqn. (40) is not just a simple second order tensor like σ_{ij}, but
derives its properties from a higher order tensor and hence enjoys a much richer
surface topology shown in Fig. 55 then the simple PNS ellipsoid geometry for
σ_{ij}.

The fact that Eqn.s (36) and (15) have the same invariant tensoral form supports
the idea, proposed in section *Point Stress Tensor Gradients in Three
Dimensions*, that a continuous stress gradient in all directions, envisioned
as a surface generated by an infinite set of stress quadric surfaces expanding
out from the center glyph, would generate a surface similar to an infinite set
of 2D plane waves eminating from a point. Indeed the surface generated by Eqn.
(36), Fig. 56, starts at a point, which is envisioned as a spherical dilatation
constructed of an infinite number of 2D plane waves expanding out in all
directions simultaneously. Each of these plane waves travels in a specific
direction called the pointing vector, ν_{i}, at a speed that
corresponds to elastic properties in the same direction. Hence, plane waves
traveling in different directions in an anisotropic material will travel at
different speeds and the continuous collection of all connected plane waves,
although initially a sphere, soon deviates into a non-spherical shape simply
because a plane wave will travel faster in stiffer directions and slower in
less stiff directions. The final result is envisioned as three wave surfaces
connected together through their points of degeneracies as shown in Fig. 56
and also in the schematic in the upper left corner of Fig. 55.

Figure 56. Complete solution to Christoffel's Eqn. (36) for Calcium Formate envisioned using translucency: VRML-1 and VRML-2.

In Fig. 56 the outer two, faster, wave surfaces are shown using translucency so that the inner two, slower, wave surface structures can be seen as a single surface connected to the outer surface. The single connected surface is seen schematically in the upper left corner of Fig. 55 and immersively by using head tracking in a back projected immersive environment. Together these three surfaces are the collection of all eigen-values solutions mapped out in all directions. This is similar to mapping out all solutions to Cauchy's equation, which is equivalent to the statement of equilibrium when mapping out the stress quadric surface, Eqn. (27). Hence the mathematical invariance of Cauchy's equation envisions static equilibrium in Fig.s 32 and 34, the same as invariance of Christoffel's equation is used to envision dynamic equilibrium in Fig. 56. This supports the idea proposed in the introduction, that "enhanced understanding is realized when graphical models are created together with the development of the mathematical models". Because Eqn.s (36) and (15) are tensor equations, information embedded in Fig.s 32, 34, and 56 facilitates discovery and insight that transcends presentational value.

Following the same idea presented in the development of Eqn. (40), it is possible
to show that the C_{ijkl} term in Eqn. (36) is a contraction of a higher
order tensor, that is the sixth order tensor, C_{ijklmn}, associated with
stress induced anisotropy.

This is on going reserach which will be posted as results become available.

Notes on the derivation of acousto-elastic effect are provided that show how
equation (36) can be modified to include an effective fourth order tensor that
is a function of an applied stress and the sixth order tensor C_{ijklmn},
see equation (35) in the derivation:
Page-1,
Page-2,
Page-3,
Page-4,
Page-5,
Page-6,
Page-7,
Page-8,
Page-9,
Page-10,
Page-11,
Page-12,
Page-13,
Page-14,
Page-15,
Page-16,
Page-17,
Page-18,
Page-19,

The contents of this web site are © Copyright Ronald D. Kriz. You may print or save an electronic copy of parts of this web site for your own personal use. If used elsewhere in published or unpublished form please cite as, "private communication, R.D. Kriz" and include link to this web address. Permission must be sought for any other use.

Send comments to: rkriz@vt.edu

Ronald D. Kriz, Short Bio

Engineering Science and Mechanics

College of Engineering

Virginia Tech

Blacksburg, Virginia 24061

Revised 08/09/06

Original: http://www.sv.vt.edu/classes/ESM4714/methods/EEG.html

Current: http://www.sv.rkriz.net/classes/ESM4714/methods/EEG.html